The Puzzle

HOLLAND

If you review the two posts previous to the Roots Tech blog, you will remember that we are trying so solve the puzzle of whether or not our Scots-Irish ancestor, Abraham Miller (our William’s father), or perhaps Abraham’s father or grandfather, left their Northern Ireland home near the village of Ballindrait, County Donegal, and fled religious persecution of the Presbyterian Covenanters by going to Holland for a period of time as did quite a number of  the Scots-Irish, including the father and grandfather of their pastor, William Traill (see [see previous posts about Traill to establish the connection between him and our Miller’s).

          John Miller-----> David Miller-----> Abraham Miller-----> William Miller

     born about 1660   born about 1685      born about 1710    born 1732 in America

The above diagram shows our William's descent from his great grandfather John Miller¹. To date, we have written very little about William's father, Abraham. Even where and when he was born continues to be a puzzle of many ill-fitting pieces that leads us to ask: Was he born in Ireland, America or Holland?! We are certain that his son William was born in 1732 in America, but our knowledge ends there and surmise begins.

Following is a summary of the conflicting information that is contained in each of three documents (see images below):

PUZZLE PIECE ONE is a document known as The Allen Family Record which claims that Abraham Miller was born in Holland, "his ancestry having fled from England during a violent persecution of Protestants." (footnote ?).

PUZZLE PIECE TWO is a page from an 1820 publication called The Christian Herald, gives a brief history of Abraham's son, Alexander. It includes a note about Alexander’s parents, listing Abraham and wife "Susannah" [footnote] nee Roddy as "both originally from the north of Ireland," but there is no mention of birth dates and no mention of Holland.

PUZZLE PIECE THREE is the transcript of a land record from Somerset County, Maryland, indicates that Abraham's grandfather, John, was already in America by 1684, lending credence to the theory that Abraham was born in America.

Here are the supporting documents:

1.   ALLEN FAMILY RECORD

                              * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1.   CHRISTIAN HERALD ARTICLE:

                        

                                 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

3.   LAND RECORDS:

Transcript of a land record from Somerset County, Maryland showing that Abraham’s grandfather was in America by 1684: 

"On 18 Sep 1684 [date is difficult to make out, but it is thought this is correct], John Miller acquires 300 acres known as “Enlargement” from John Emmett and his wife Hanna. John and his wife Isabell sell part of this land to Samuel Taylor on 5 Feb 1697/8.  On 24 Mar 1697/8, John Miller sells another 100 acres of Enlargement to Samuel Davis. “Enlargement” is situated on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 1 ½ mile south of the Pokomoke River." (Source: Somerset Co. Deeds, Liber L 1, p. 442)  

Other land records clearly show how parcels in Somerset County, Maryland, Newcastle County, Delaware, and Cecil County Maryland, were handed from John to David to Abraham and finally to William (see previous posts using “land record, Miller” as your search terms).

                               * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

So according to these three sources, Abraham was either born in Holland, Northern Ireland or America. Did I mention this was an "ill-fitting puzzle"?!

Next time: We will continue exploring whether the Miller's really went to Holland or not, and where Abraham was born. Your theories are welcome! Just write to me in the comments section below, or email them to me, so I can enter them into the mix of ideas!

_____________________________________________

FOOTNOTE

1:   Birth years of all except William Miller are approximated from William’s known birth year of 1732.

ROOTS TECH 2013

Hi to all,

Hi all,

The first link below is to a genealogy blog that I follow, not because we have any ancestors in common, but because Jana does lots of wonderful posts that are of interest to family history buffs in general. 

This link takes you to her blog about the Roots Tech Conference going on in Salt Lake City, Utah, this week on March 21-23. There is an interesting video to watch, plus Jana lists the sessions that will be streaming live on those days. 

Worth a look! 
Donna

(sorry the links below aren't "hot." You'll have to cut and paste them into your server's address box)

http://janasgenealogyandfamilyhistory.blogspot.com/2013/03/will-you-be-watching.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+JanasGenealogyandFamilyHistoryblogspot%2FCVLPx+%28Jana%27s+Genealogy+and+Family+History+Blog%29&utm_content=Google+Reader 


Here is the link for Roots Tech itself:   http://rootstech.org/ 

Did Our Miller Ancestors Flee From Northern Ireland to Holland?

In an effort to answer this question and learn more about our Miller ancestors before they arrived in America, and especially whether or not there is a Holland connection, we are studying the lives of their religious leaders in hopes of finding clues about our ancestors. In previous posts we have discussed the relationship between our Miller's and their pastor in Ireland, the Reverend William Traill. The article below deals with William's father, Rev. Robert Traill, who was a prisoner of Cromwell for a period of time:

Rev. Robert Traill
(source: http://www.covenanter.org/RTraill/roberttraill.htm ) 

"Born in Elie, May, 1642.  After the usual prepatory studies, he was sent to the College of Edinburgh, where he distinguished himself in the several classes.  He devoted his life to the ministry and the cause of the church of his fathers.  This devotion was greatly manifested by his attendance upon Mr. James Guthrie, minister of Stirling, on the scaffold of martyrdom, 1661.  In 1666, in consequence of some copies of the Apologetical Relation, a work (penned by John Brown, of Wamphray) hated by the prelates, and condemned by the Privy Council to the flames, found in his home, he was obliged with his mother and brother to go into hiding.  It is reported that Robert Traill was in arms with the Covenanters when they were routed at Pentland Hills.  Because of this, he found it necessary to flee to Holland, where his father was already, in 1667.  Sometime around 1669, he returned to London and commenced his ministry there.  In 1677, while visiting Scotland, he was apprehended and arraigned before the Privy Council.  He refused to clear himself by their unlawful oath and was, upon little evidence, sentenced to imprisonment on the Bass rock.  He was released after three months and returned to London where he continued to officiate as pastor of a Presbyterian congregation until his death, in May, 1716," (http://www.covenanter.org/RTraill/roberttraill.htm; highlight added). 

Note that when Robert Traill fled to Holland, his father was already living there:
"The father of Robert Traill, who was minister of the Greyfriars’ Church, Edinburgh, was one of those bold witnesses for the Covenant, who lived during the stormy period of the Commonwealth, and the still more trying season of the Restoration, in which, at the age of sixty, he was banished from Scotland for life upon the charge of holding a conventicle, because he had read and expounded Scripture to a few friends who were assembled in his house. In consequence of this sentence he retired to Holland, the usual place of refuge for the exiled Presbyterians of Scotland, and there spent the rest of his life." ( http://www.electricscotland.com/history/men/traill_robert.htm )

So here is the big question: Did our Miller ancestors follow the example of the Traill's and also flee from Northern Ireland to Holland?? 

We will examine that very question in upcoming posts.

More On Rev. Traill, Minister to Our Miller Family in Donegal, Ireland

In previous posts we have learned that our William Miller's ancestry was closely associated with the Presbyterian Church in the Ballindrait area of County Donegal, Northern Ireland, and specifically with the Reverend William Trail. Here is an interesting history that includes information about Rev. Traill (see previous posts for William Traill's connection to our Miller's)

RIVER FOYLE
Courtesy of http://www.dipity.com/tickr/Flickr_foyle/

The Laggan and its Presbyterianism

Reference 3A

CHAPTER I (Excerpts)

EARLY LAGGAN HISTORY

In looking at a map of the County Donegal, it will be seen that the north- eastern part of the county, which is the most northerly part of Ireland, is a peninsula washed on the eastern side by the waters of Lough Foyle and on the western by Lough Swilly. This is Inishowen, a mountainous and, to a large extent, a barren country.

Immediately to the south of it is a fertile and comparatively flat country, lying between the river Foyle and the upper reaches of Lough Swilly, and extending in one direction from the City of Derry to Stranorlar, and in another from Lifford to Letterkenny. This is the district which in by­ gone times was well and widely known under the name of THE LAGGAN, and formed the most productive and desirable portion of the ancient territory of Tyrconnell. Never having been at any time a county or fiscal division of any kind, its boundaries were never accurately defined, but, roughly speaking, it might be said to correspond to the north Barony of Raphoe, running for a short distance at its southern end into the south Barony.

The name would appear to be a very old one. It has been conjectured, and not without good reason, that it is the place referred to by Ptolemy, a Greek writer who lived in the second century of the Christian era, and who wrote a description of the Western world, as the Logia, and which in aftertimes is called Locha by the ancient Irish, and Logan by the early

English writers. This conjecture is corroborated, and, indeed, made almost a certainty, by the fact that Ptolemy speaks of two large waters or rivers adjoining the Logia, which he calls the Argita and the Vidua, the former of which antiquaries and geographers of bygone times regarded as the Finn or river of Lough Foyle, and the latter as Lough Swilly.

Colgan, in his "Acta", describes the Laggan as "In Tir-conallia, inter due maris brachia, nempe inter sinum Loch Febhuil, et sinum de Suilech". ("In Tyrconnel, between two arms of the sea that is, be­tween the bay of Lough Foyle and the bay of Swilly". )

. . . . .  suffered for his cause, and that their only offence was refusing to appear before the Bishop's court, which was contrary to their principles, ordered their release.

At a meeting of the Laggan Presbytery, held on the 2nd of February, 1681, it was resolved that considering the providences of God towards His Church and people in Britain and Ireland, they judged it their duty to call the people under their inspection to humiliation, prayer, and fasting, and appointed the 17th of that month to be observed as a day of fasting and prayer, and drew up a paper called the Causes of the said Fast. Now this would not, in the eyes of most people, appear to be a very grievous offence. nevertheless for having the audacity to do so, four members of the Presbytery, viz., Messrs. John Hart, of Monreagh; William Trail, of Ballindrait; James Alexander, of Convoy; and Robert Campbell, of Ray, were summoned to appear before the Bench of Magistrates at St. Johnston, and afterwards at Raphoe, and were examined "anent the Causes of the Fast." But the matter did not end here. The Government seems to have looked upon this very inoffensive and, most people would think, commendable action on the part of the Presbytery as a very serious offence; for in the following June these four ministers were ordered to appear within eight days before the Lord Lieutenant and Council at Dublin. They did so, and after being closely questioned regarding the object they had in view in appointing this day of humiliation and prayer, they were bound over to appear and stand their trial at the next Assizes in Lifford. There they were found guilty of appointing and keeping a fast, and were fined in £20 each and ordered to give bail that they would not offend in a similar way in future !  This they refused to do, and were committed to gaol, where they were kept prisoners for upwards of eight months. They were not confined in the common prison, but like the Apostle Paul were permitted to dwell in their own hired house; and as the apostle did, they received all who came in unto them, for we are told they preached every Lord's Day in turn, but sometimes their hearers were driven away, and on one occasion a person who was going to hear them was apprehended by the officers of the town and bid go to church, and because he would not he was put into the stocks. At length, after sending several petitions to the council in Dublin, an order was given for their release, and the fines imposed at the Assizes reduced to twenty shillings each.

The authorities must have regarded these Laggan ministers as very dangerous and desperate men. Mr. Trail, in an account which he wrote of his examination before the council in Dublin, tells us that amongst other questions, he was asked if he was in the habit of riding through the country armed with a sword and pistols. Mr. Trail denied this charge and said there was neither sword nor gun about his house. He was also questioned about his attendance at an alleged unlawful assembly at Donoughmore, which continued from Thursday, June the 2nd, to Monday, June the 6th; but, as Mr. Trail explained, this great meeting was nothing but the week-day services usually held at the time of the keeping of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, and that on this occasion he had preached.

It is sad to find that the early annals of Presbyterianism in this district are so largely made up of the oppression and afflictions to which those who adhered to it were subjected at the hand of men who should have befriended them. These Irishmen who came from Scotland were in general plain, inoffensive, industrious men, willing to endure hardship in reclaiming and cultivating the land that had fallen to their lot, and in promoting the welfare of their adopted country, and all that they asked for was to be permitted to do so in peace, and to hold to what they regarded as the truth. But the authorities both of Church and State seem to have been sadly lacking in understanding of the times, and to have thought it impossible for a man to be a Presbyterian and at the same time a useful citizen and loyal subject. Toleration and Christian charity were matters that received little consideration at the hands of the dignitaries of the only Church the law recognised or tolerated, and they appear to have regarded their Church as an instrument of government rather than a means of conveying Divine truth.

Viewed in the light of the present age, it must, I think, be admitted that these old Ulster Scots were in advance of the times in which they lived, and if the principles of civil and religious liberty for which they contended so stoutly and suffered so bitterly had been given free course, the state of our Northern Province from then up to the present would have been more pleasant and peaceable for all parties concerned than it has been, and brethren who never should have differed would have dwelt together in unity." 

Source: http://www.greencastlemuseum.org/